top of page

Publications

Ten Questions Concerning Housing Sufficiency
Aldrick Arceo, Marianne Touchie,  William O'Brien, Tianzhen Hong, Jeetika Malik, Matan Mayer, Terri Peters, Shoshanna Saxe, Ruth Tamas, Hannah Villeneuve, Benoît Schamltz
Energy and Buildings (under review)

Thermostat Standardization, Technology Trends, Future Considerations: Expert Interviews
Ruth Tamas, William O'Brien, Philip Agee
Energy & Buildings (2024)

Developing Thermostat User Mental Models to Inform Energy-Saving Design
Ruth Tamas, William O'Brien, Mario Santana Quintero
Spring Nature (2023)

Evolving Interaction: A Qualitative Investigation of User Mental Models for Smart Thermostat Users
Ruth Tamas, William O'Brien, Mario Santana Quintero
Architectural Science Review (2023)

Comparative Usability Study Between Two Prototype Commercial Building Thermostat Interfaces
Justin Vezeau, Ruth Tamas, William O'Brien, Philip Agee
Science & Technology for the Built Environment (2023)

A Mixed Methods Approach for Investigating Residential Building Thermostat Interfaces in the Context of Use, Usability, and User Understanding
Ruth Tamas
Carleton University Press (2022)

Residential Thermostat Usability: Comparing Manual, Programmable, and Smart Devices
Ruth Tamas, William O'Brien, Mario Santana Quintero
Building & Environment (2021)

A Field Study on the Effect of Building Automation on Perceived Comfort and Control
Ruth Tamas, Mohamed M. Ouf, William O'Brien
Architectural Science Review (2020)

Usability and Comfort in Canadian Offices: Interview of 170 University Employees
Mohamed M. Ouf, Ruth Tamas,  William O'Brien
IOP Conference Series (2019)

Summertime Window Use Behaviour in Air-Conditioned Condominiums
Ruth Tamas, William O'Brien, Burak Gunay
IBPSA Canada Conference Series: Building Simulation to Support Building Sustainability (2019)

Projects 

Passive House

Post-Occupancy Evaluation

Six state-of-the-art passive homes finish construction.
What happens next?

Overview

Post-occupancy evaluation can be used to identify and remedy a building’s performance gap.

​

Feedback related to system function, occupant satisfaction, and data benchmarking enables developers to make empirically informed decisions and adjustments.

 

Employing industry standards this bespoke methodology highlights occupant experience and system usability.

​

This is an ongoing project with Peel Passive House, Carleton University, and the University of Toronto.

Deliverables

  • Research strategy

  • Data collection

  • Data analysis

  • Data dissemination

Sustainable Buildings Canada
Better Condominiums Boot Camp

Toronto's Climate Goals call for significant deep energy retrofits.
How do we streamline development?

Overview

By 2030, the City of Toronto aims to reduce building emissions to net zero.

 

This requires collaboration between building owners, operators, property managers, tenants, and condominium boards. The Better Condominiums Boot Camp brings these groups together for three workshops to disseminate knowledge and navigate legislation to support successful deep energy retrofits. Redraft is responsible for program evaluation and feedback.

 

This is an ongoing project with Sustainable Buildings Canada and the City of Toronto. 

Deliverables

  • Research strategy

  • Data collection

  • Data analysis

  • Data dissemination

Car Cabin Comfort Testing

Evaluating occupant comfort in automobiles.
Delivered to BMW.

Overview

BMW offers customers a luxury automobile experience - not only in terms of automobile mechanics and aesthetics, but also in the subtleties of occupant comfort.

 

Working with the Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics in Munich, Germany, a methodology for comfort evaluation was developed for the client, BMW automobiles. Users were surveyed and feedback was implemented to adjust the interior comfort systems.

Deliverables

  • Research strategy

  • Product design

  • Human factors evaluation

Thermostat standardization:
Expert Opinion

Smart thermostats offer new features and promise energy savings.
Should they be standardized? Experts weigh in.

Overview

Thermostats dictate energy consumption in our built environment.  No standards exist to ensure their usability, which frequently results in wasted energy. Moreover, thermostats continue to become more complex as HVAC systems and buildings diversify.

​

In a joint project with the National Research Council of Canada and Carleton University, this project delivers scope and priorities for a thermostat standard. Twenty-five experts from public, academic, and private sectors weigh in. 

Deliverables

  • Research strategy

  • Data collection

  • Data analysis

  • Data dissemination

Thermostat Evaluation & Redesign

Improve thermostat usability to promote energy savings.
Delivered to Carleton University.

Overview

This project sought to investigate and improve thermostat usability for commercial, single-zone thermostats.​​​​​​​

Identify current and setpoint temperatures

Display schedule

Controls are easy to locate

Encourage exploration

Provide immediate feedback

Provide confirmation prompts

Use natural and logical language

Display clear instructions

Enable and support programming

Provide undo button

Redesign 

Home Screen

Pasted Graphic 1 2.tiff
Pasted Graphic 18.tiff
Pasted Graphic 24.tiff
Pasted Graphic 6 2.tiff

Hold Temperature Time Limit

Pasted Graphic 4 2.tiff
Pasted Graphic 5 2.tiff

Supportive Scheduling

Pasted Graphic 7 2.tiff
Pasted Graphic 9 3.tiff

Schedule Exploring

Thermostat Usability Investigation

Thermostats control 9% of North America's energy consumption.
How we use them matters.

Objective

Establish and compare the usability of manual, programmable, and smart thermostat interfaces

Process

Conduct participant interviews: Usability testing, participant observation, surveys

Analyse data:

Task duration, interactions, success/failure, user feedback

Produce usability metrics: 

Compare manual, programmable, and smart devices

Survey Questions

Demographic information

​

Participant-assigned usability score

​

Desired thermostat features

Qualitative insights

Usability testing

Interactions per task

​

Task duration

​

Task success/failure

​

Participant confusion

Quantitative usability metrics

Results

User-rated usability

Time to complete usability tasks

Success/failure per task

Thermostat Features

Desirable features

Zone-specific setpoints

More energy use feedback

Remote control

Weak features

Lack of instructions

Lack of feedback

Lack of guidance 

Conclusions

Smart thermostats perform better than programable thermostats and offer more features

System status (on/off) most commonly indicated through auditory feedback, not visual feedback

Strong desire for increased visual feedback related to energy consumption and cost

Over half of the participants (51) desired or enjoyed remote thermostat control

Ruth Tamas

MASC., B.Eng

London, UK

bottom of page